[c++0x] result_of

[Jonathan Wakely]

2008/10/5 Jonathan Wakely:
> 2008/10/5 Paolo Carlini:
>>
>> Earlier today I added the C++0x versions of the existing
>> tr1::reference_wrapper tests + the testcase from libstdc++/24803 (which
>> I assigned to myself, but only tentatively): while we are touching
>> reference_wrapper too, we should make sure not to regress, and, if
>> possible, we should also fix 24803 (the minimal version). Can you double
>> check your existing patch vs the 3 additional testcases? And / or we can
>> imagine splitting out the reference_wrapper changes... probably I'm Ok
>> with any plan you may want to suggest... Just let me know...
>
> Thanks for CCing me on the other PRs, I'll review them and run the new
> testcases in the next couple of days and get back to you.

My change causes regressions for the new tests, I've broken INVOKE()
but I know what the problem is and it can be solved by the "bit of
genius" in _Mem_fn.

Jonathan