[PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.

[Chris Fairles]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we are absolutely on the same page here. And I'm explicitly adding Mark in CC.
>
> Only:
>
>> The libstdc++ bits look ok to me: thanks for moving the ball
>> forward on this Chris.
>
> Sure, many thanks again. My only concern: can you please double check the dg-do run lines on top of the testcases and make sure that we are not trying to run tests requiring new gthr.h facilities on targets which use anything but posix threads?

Will check and resubmit (libstdc++ parts only). I'll update the gthr*
stuff as per Benjamin's suggestions and submit in a new thread.

Chris