[v3] mutex vs. cstdatomic
Benjamin Kosnik
bkoz@redhat.com
Sat Dec 13 20:10:00 GMT 2008
> With a straight up swap of bool for atomic_bool, I'm seeing a lot of
> these:
>
> atomic_2.h:312: _ITp
> std::__atomic2::__atomic_base<_IntTp>::load(std::memory_order) const
> volatile [with _ITp = bool]:
> Assertion `__m == memory_order_release' failed.
This was intended, as memory_order_release doesn't meet the
specified requirements for this function.
-benjamin
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list