Clarification about the cons_virtual_derivation.cc tests
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Tue Aug 5 08:50:00 GMT 2008
Hi,
>> Therefore, I'm a little puzzled. I'm not sure why we want to have
>> fails here (then xfailed); I'm not sure whether we believe we can
>> change something in our specific implementation in order to have
>> passes, while remaining conforming. Or whether we want to pursue this
>> issue as DR?!? Can you clarify?
>>
> I am using these as markers for some ongoing error-handling work,
> and understand that the current state may be confusing.
>
Ok, thanks. I'll see if I can tweak a bit the tests to avoid xfails
while keeping of course the tests themselves and the general logic.
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list