[PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers

Paolo Bonzini bonzini@gnu.org
Sat Apr 19 17:27:00 GMT 2008


>>> Should I still use $(LN_S) -f?
>>> Ignoring return value and 2>/dev/null seems safer.
>> Yes.  At least in this case where we know that the destination of the  
>> symbolic link won't change.
> 
> Sorry, but I fail to parse your reply.

It's ambiguous at best.

> What is your "yes" referring to?
> 
> IOW: I take it that I should _not_ use $(LN_S) -f,
> but that I should ignore the return value (which the patch already does)
> and add 2>/dev/null to the patch.

Yes.

Paolo



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list