[PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
Paolo Bonzini
bonzini@gnu.org
Sat Apr 19 17:27:00 GMT 2008
>>> Should I still use $(LN_S) -f?
>>> Ignoring return value and 2>/dev/null seems safer.
>> Yes. At least in this case where we know that the destination of the
>> symbolic link won't change.
>
> Sorry, but I fail to parse your reply.
It's ambiguous at best.
> What is your "yes" referring to?
>
> IOW: I take it that I should _not_ use $(LN_S) -f,
> but that I should ignore the return value (which the patch already does)
> and add 2>/dev/null to the patch.
Yes.
Paolo
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list