[v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x

Ian Lance Taylor iant@google.com
Sat Oct 27 01:04:00 GMT 2007


Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

> 3) The hash extensions are used, no doubt, but there is a way forward
> here as well. (See my emails).

I'm sure I've missed something, but: how about keeping ext/hash* where
they are, and adding backward_warning?

Ian



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list