RFA: Another installed-tree testing patch

[Mark Mitchell]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
>>> As I've noted in the comment, this is all an ugly hack; the right
>>> answer is for the compiler to have a -print-include-dirs option that
>>> we could pass to g++, and then just include that list for the C
>>> compiler.  But, we don't have that.
>>
>> Yes. We've been around about this before, remember?
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-10/msg00328.html

Actually, I didn't.  I'm sorry; thanks for the reminder!

> It seems fair to allow you to do the expedient thing in the meantime.

Thanks, I've checked in the patch.  If I get a spare minute, I'll try to
have a go at the -print-include-dirs thing -- and if anyone else wants
to try, I'll certainly commit to reviewing it.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713