state of libstdcxx_so_7-branch
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Thu May 3 18:22:00 GMT 2007
Doug Gregor wrote:
> I guess that depends... perhaps the cxx0x-branch will contain both
> libstdc++-v3 (built as C++98) and libstdc++-v4 (built as C++0x).
> Several years out, when GCC releases its first C++0x compiler with
> concepts, a concept-enhanced library, etc., we'll need to ship both
> side-by-side anyway for backward compatibility reasons.
Humm... In practice, if I remember correctly, we could do the same we
did between gcc2.95.3 and gcc3.0.0: for some time we had two completely
separate directories, libstdc++ and libstdc++-v3. In that case, however,
we never shipped libstdc++ together with the new gcc3.x series, we
renounced to a compatibility mode. In this case we could start the same
and then we'll see... Also, in the present case the libstdc++-v3
directory would stay in sync with the mainline one, thus including some
C++0x non-ABI breaking features, ported from libstdc++-v4.
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list