[RFC] Removal of allocator::construct / destroy vs our containers
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Thu May 3 12:30:00 GMT 2007
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Cool! I guess this waits for a more elaborate discussion in Toronto as
> well...
Oh well, it's just a small tweak. Frankly, I should have done this
already when I added the various _M_get_* everywhere (with Howard's help).
I'm thinking of applying the patch even earlier than Toronto, that way,
in case construct / destroy will stay, we are ok, performance-wise,
anyway. Otherwise, in case construct / destroy will actually go away, it
would be only matter of tweaking a bit the posted patch, matter of a few
lines. That way we could relax, not having to remember for months to
apply this last patch in case construct / destroy eventually stay...
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list