tr1::regex boilerplate
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Mon Mar 12 12:54:00 GMT 2007
Stephen M. Webb wrote:
>Hey all you all,
>
>I've managed to catch a little bit of breath during a Krunch Time That Never
>Ends and put together a review patch of my original regex boilerplate and
>some test cases for an initial review. Please have at it. Don't hold back.
>Do your worst, I lost my pride years ago.
>
>
:) I quickly applied the patch, fixed a couple of trivial issues (like
"" in wstring constructors) and ran the regression tests on x86 and x86_64:
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/algorithms/search/char/1-ecma.cc
execution test
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/algorithms/search/char/1-posix.cc
execution test
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/algorithms/search/char/2-ecma.cc
execution test
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/algorithms/search/char/2-posix.cc
execution test
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/algorithms/search/char/3-ecma.cc
execution test
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/algorithms/search/char/3-posix.cc
execution test
FAIL: tr1/7_regular_expressions/regex/cons/char/c_string_extended_bad.cc
execution test
Are those fails actually expected? I think so, I think unimplemented
functions are involved, but wanted to be sure (maybe you wanted to test
something else...) and in case xfail the tests for now and go ahead.
>Hopefully I'll be able to catch some free coding cycles to whip more of the
>meat and potatoes of the parser and engine into a presentable form in the
>next little while.
>
Please!
Thanks,
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list