TR1 Math Special Functions

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>> FAIL: 
>> tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_value.cc 
>> execution test
>> FAIL: 
>> tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/02_assoc_legendre/check_value.cc 
>> execution test
>> FAIL: 
>> tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/17_hyperg/check_value.cc 
>> execution test
>> FAIL: 
>> tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/18_laguerre/check_value.cc 
>> execution test
>> FAIL: 
>> tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/22_sph_legendre/check_value.cc 
>> execution test
>
> Should these just be xfailed for x86-linux for the time being, or 
> (IMHO better) just comment out the max_abs_frac tests in the failing 
> check_value.cc files for the time being? Since really there  is just 
> one of many tests that are failing in these test files.
>
> At this point, I'd really like to see this go in, hopefully say on 
> Monday. Paolo, what say you?

I agree, but I would hate to see lots of unexpected fails on testresults 
or, worse, reports of bootstrap failures. Thus, I mean to regtest for 
2-3 different targets over the week-end and report on the absolutely 
minimal set of xfails or fixes in order to commit on monday...

Paolo.