c++0x implementation and compatibilty thoughts
Fri Apr 27 15:02:00 GMT 2007
On Apr 27, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>> C++0x behavior from components in namespace std, TR1 behavior from
>> components in namespace std::tr1.
> I'm still a little leary of mixing items with the same name and
> different behavior in a namespace (std) and a nested namespace
> We should definitely try it though.
It occurred to me afterward that it still makes sense to put the C+
+0x-specific versions into namesspace std::__cxx200x and then use a
strong using directive to pull them into namespace 'std'. That way,
we don't pollute the linker namespace 'std' with experimental C++0x
More information about the Libstdc++