std::isinfinite

Mateusz Loskot mateusz@loskot.net
Sat Sep 30 20:17:00 GMT 2006


Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> In any case, consider that all those facilities are
>> already in std for the next C++ standard, are rather uncontrversial
>> C99 facilities, and it seems, well, late to implement complicated
>> solutions...
> 
> Hmm, it's interesting. Could you point me any document about that?
> 
> I couldn't find anything explicitly said about it, or you mean
> it's a subject of "Synchronizing the C++ preprocessor with C99"
> 
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1969.html

Paolo,

OK, I think I've found it:

http://www.research.att.com/~bs/C++0x_keynote.pdf

Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list