Mateusz Loskot
Sat Sep 30 20:17:00 GMT 2006

Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> In any case, consider that all those facilities are
>> already in std for the next C++ standard, are rather uncontrversial
>> C99 facilities, and it seems, well, late to implement complicated
>> solutions...
> Hmm, it's interesting. Could you point me any document about that?
> I couldn't find anything explicitly said about it, or you mean
> it's a subject of "Synchronizing the C++ preprocessor with C99"


OK, I think I've found it:

Mateusz Loskot

More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list