C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)

Gennaro Prota gennaro_prota@yahoo.com
Tue Sep 19 23:27:00 GMT 2006


On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:54:46 +0200, Theodore Papadopoulo
<Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr> wrote:

[...]
>
>Calling the extension -std=c++0x is probably a wrong choice as it seems
>to make some promise...

As Gabriel says "C++0x" is the working name, so there's no promise. To
avoid any misunderstanding however one could chose

 -std=c++0x-draft

or perhaps

 -std=c++-post-1998-draft

so that in future a similar naming scheme (next would be, for
instance, -std=c++-post-2009-draft) if desired.

--
Genny.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list