C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)

Gennaro Prota gennaro_prota@yahoo.com
Tue Sep 19 23:27:00 GMT 2006

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:54:46 +0200, Theodore Papadopoulo
<Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr> wrote:

>Calling the extension -std=c++0x is probably a wrong choice as it seems
>to make some promise...

As Gabriel says "C++0x" is the working name, so there's no promise. To
avoid any misunderstanding however one could chose


or perhaps


so that in future a similar naming scheme (next would be, for
instance, -std=c++-post-2009-draft) if desired.


More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list