C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr> writes:

| On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 10:15 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
| > And I suggest to either warn about or disable c++0x features if
| > -std=c++0x is not specified (barring a way to have tr1 use c++0x
| > features even if not
| > in c++0x mode).
| 
| Calling the extension -std=c++0x is probably a wrong choice as it seems
| to make some promise...

Hear! Hear! Hear!

Things that are C++0x are those we have already voted into the C++
standard Working Draft and hope will not disappear after the public
review (expected in two years or so).  Then, there are various different
things various people  would like to get into the Working Draft.  We
should exercise caution in their labelling, whether we have them
as GNU extensions or not. 

-- Gaby