Recent 4.1 breakage...

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>No! That's the whole point of my patch: the VERIFY bits are actually 
>>doing the right work, are changing test!
>>    
>>
>only changing test variable tho, means no need for VERIFY, ie no need
>to #undef.
>
>ie could be
>test &= bool(...)
>
>instead of VERIFY(...)
>  
>
But like this, simply commenting out the initial #undef one gets the 
original, finer grained because of the individual assertions, testcase! 
I think you should be more proud of the VERIFY machinery that you 
designed well *before* I started contributing to v3! ;)

Paolo.