PATCH to valarray

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jan 30, 2006, at 6:58 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
>
> | we should be more careful at  what we say should go into 4.1.0.
>
> I have not applied the patch yet to libstdc++ in 4.1.0.
> The issue being considered are of efficiency concern for some GNU
> projects (e.g. GDL),
> Have you unconvered a bug in the patch?

This was in general, and not towards you or your patch.
I am just more concerned that GCC 4.1.0 will be delayed because
a patch which did not fix a regression, caused a regression.

This is the same concern I have with the 128bit long double patch.

-- Pinski