[RFC] : Compiling libstdc++ with warnings on

[chris jefferson]

Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
>   
>> I'm only not totally happy about the bitset<0> specialization,
>> but considering that we already have it for the base class, probably is
>> acceptable.
>>  
>>
>>     
> I'm finishing testing the below, which I like a lot better: two less
> specializations by reversing the loops in the primary template. Both the
> tree level dumps and the final assembly are essentially equivalent, if
> not a tad better.
>
> And, those trivial specializations *must* be inline, Chris, otherwise,
> it's a perfect recipe for a linkage disaster ;)
>   
Woops, I'm always forgetting inlines.. :\

Just wanted to say thanks for cleaning my patch up, I agree that all the
changes you've made improve it over what I submitted :)

Chris