[v3] libstdc++/26142

[Paolo Carlini]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

>Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
>
>| This reverts to previous behavior. In this case, the top level
>| __gnu_debug namespace is composed of std::debug and
>| __gnu_cxx::debug.  It's assumed that users could similarly create
>| their own ::debug namespace. 
>
>So we assume we reserve the name "debug"?  
>I mean, do we document that 
>
>    #define debug 0
>    #include <header-with-debug-behaviour>
>
>is invalid as far as libstdc++ is concerned?
>  
>
Yes, I'm really puzzled about this story, I may be missing some
important details... Why aren't we uglifying everything, as usual?!?

Paolo.