[Patch] libstdc++/29989

[Doug Gregor]

On Dec 4, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> I seem to remember this was done because some platforms defined min
> and max as macros; I can't remember from the top of my head.  They are
> reserved names anyway, so we *can* #undef them with no harm, and I
> see no pressure in removing the #undefs.

<windows.h> is known to #define min and max as macros.

	Cheers,
	Doug