Couple of new issues in mainline

[Mark Mitchell]

Paolo Carlini wrote:

> I think that, for various reasons (the function is not exported + the
> type qualifier is indeed ignored), it's safe to simply remove the const
> qualifier, as in the below, which I'm finishing testing and mean to
> apply later today.

Just for the record: it's always safe to do remove the qualifier if you
get the warning, since the qualified is not part of the mangled name
anyhow.  When the front-end says "ignored" it really means it -- it's as
if you never wrote the "const" in the first place.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713