Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

[Richard Henderson]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:45:46AM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Richard, sorry, I don't agree, on second thought. You are not
> considering that the idea is using a "smart" libgcc, a la glibc, as per
> Mark and Uli messages.

Yes, I am.  I stand by my statement: libgcc is the wrong level at
which to attack this.  If you want to make libstdc++ auto-detect
the machine, that's fine.  But it has to be in code specific to
that library.



r~