[Patch] libstdc++/23425

Paolo Carlini pcarlini@suse.de
Wed Nov 2 14:57:00 GMT 2005


chris jefferson wrote:

>In the case where it isn't removed, I find that this loop is slightly
>faster for deques, and slightly slower for vectors. Depends on what
>tradeoff should be made really.
>  
>
By the way, in your experiments when isn't the loop removed? In mine,
for vector things are very nice: all the PODs I tried are fine, PODs +
simple constructors are also fine.

Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list