std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Jonathan Wakely wrote:
| 
| >I don't think anything strange is going on, I just wonder if it would be
| >better if we implemented the proposed resolution (as Dinkum already
| >does) because
| >  
| >
| But I have to remind you that, as a policy we do **not** implement
| resolutions in the "Open" status. What if the final resolution is different?

In this particular case, do we insist on implementing something that is
hardly justifiable, apart from a literal reading that does no service?
I think, the answer must be no.

-- Gaby