[RFC] What to do for complex::pow(0, 0)

[Paolo Carlini]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

>| Indeed. Now, for c99 target we are actually calling __builtin_cpow
>| (was not the case one week ago due to a trivial oversight) and
>| consistency with cpow is basically automatic. In case of non-c99
>| platforms (thus missing, in general, cpow) we open code the
>| complex::pow code (and return consistently (0, 0) for
>| zero^zero). Seems a satisfactory solution.
>
>I do not understand.  Please could you elaborate?
>  
>
What, exactly, you don't understand?!? This is just what we have, I tried
to summarize the situation to Mark which is not supposed to follow in
detail our list.

Paolo.