Fallout (mostly runtime library-related) from GCC version number change (take two)

[Paolo Carlini]

Zack Weinberg wrote:

>It appears so.  At least, my trial 'make install' (done, note, without
>--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs) appears to have created a
>correct directory tree.  If you could tell me which files are being
>installed incorrectly for you, I can check that they are installed
>correctly with my patch.
>  
>
Sure and easy.

What happens here, on x86-linux, for a very simple 
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-exp configure, is that the whole set of 
libstdc++ headers, that should be installed under 
/usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/4.1.0/, ends up inside 
/usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/const/

Of course not even "Hello World" compiles anymore...

Thanks,
Paolo.

P.S. Given my timezone, I will not be able to provide more feedback 
before tomorrow.