Hunting for performance regressions in libstdc++
Fri Jun 17 15:21:00 GMT 2005
On Jun 17, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Howard Hinnant wrote:
> By the way, a slightly pedantic remark even if correct, admittedly:
> wouldn't be more correct in the pseudocode '<' instead of '<=', and
> likewise '>' instead of '>='?
Your comment is a little ambiguous as there are multiple pseudocode
listings. Did you mean all of them? I've briefly glanced at all of
them containing "<=" or ">=" and don't immediately see any errors.
However, I'm happy to look at a specific pseudocode listing in more
detail. I've certainly made errors before and I'm sure will again.
More information about the Libstdc++