[Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Tue Jun 7 18:04:00 GMT 2005
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>| Is this what you were implying? I think you are right WRT to the rest
>| of the deprecated headers, at least the ones in the C++ standard under
>| annex D. We have to keep these for the time being.
>
>Yes. Let's remove complex.h.
>
>
Humm, therefore we are going to remove *only* complex.h and keep all the
others?!? Also, I checked Annex D and, besides <strstream>, which is not
really the point of this thread, I don't see any C++ *.h header
mentioned. I only see the heading "Old iostreams members", notice
*members*, which indeed we provide. Really, I'm not convinced that we
have a sound rationale for removing complex.h and keep all the other
backward headers.
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list