[Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
Benjamin Kosnik
bkoz@redhat.com
Tue Jun 7 16:42:00 GMT 2005
> Hmm, I'm confused. But, yes, I agree we may probably stop
> <complex.h> since it now means something different in C99.
> Hmm. C++ + C99 == mess.
I agree with the C++ vs. C99 sentiment.
However, it is not exactly clear what you mean WRT backwards/complex.h.
I'd like to remove it. Since backwards is searched by default for C++
compiles, and there is no easy way to remove this from the include
search path, it looks like this will be a serious issue WRT libstdc++
vs. libc.
Is this what you were implying? I think you are right WRT to the rest
of the deprecated headers, at least the ones in the C++ standard under
annex D. We have to keep these for the time being.
-benjamin
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list