PATCH: LDFLAGS handling in V3

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:56:25PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> >That would be a bug.  LDFLAGS are intended to be compiler driver
> >options; that's not a new requirement.
> 
> OK, great.  So, then, the libstdc++ Makefiles should turn them into -Wc, 
> options to libtool, rather than -Wl, as I proposed?  That would make 
> clear to libtool that it needs to pass them along to the compiler, 
> rather than silently ignore them.  Thoughts?

Or you could do that in the top level, since only --sysroot is affected?
Will libtool pass -Wc options to the link phase?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC