[fw@deneb.enyo.de: GraphViz is now free software]

[Paolo Carlini]

Jonathan Wakely wrote:

>No, I agree completely, but according to
>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
>the CPL _is_ a free software licence, even if it is GPL-incompatible.
>The GCC website runs on Apache with mod_php, which is at least as
>GPL-incompatible as the CPL, but I haven't noticed the website being
>taken down as a result ;-)
>  
>
Ok, thanks for the details ;-)

>If a GPL-compatible implementation of dot is what the SC wanted then I
>guess their objection still stands, so I'll get back to my lunch.
>  
>
I ignore completely the details of this story: please try to dig out 
from the
archives the actual requirements...

Paolo.