Unuglified name in __normal_iterator

Paolo Carlini pcarlini@suse.de
Sun Apr 17 18:55:00 GMT 2005


caj@cs.york.ac.uk wrote:

>More personal worry was more that someone might use this function without
>realising its non-standard (as reverse_iterator does provide a base
>method)...
>  
>
Bah, I'm not particularly worried by this, by itself, maybe a disclaimer
in a code comment (this is our general policy, in such cases, I think).

Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list