RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]

[Mark Mitchell]

Zack Weinberg wrote:

>Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:
>
>  
>
>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:51:03 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>>I think that's pretty compelling, and I'm actually pretty sanguine about
>>>>the safety of the patch.  I've reviewed the patch and I'm happy with it.  I
>>>>certainly agree that issuing the diagnostics on the line with the function
>>>>declaration is a win.
>>>>
>>>>I think that it would be good for Jason to comment, before we make a final
>>>>decision
>>>>        
>>>>
>>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I agree.
>>>      
>>>
>>You agree that it would be good for you to comment, or you agree that you
>>are happy with the patch? :-)
>>    
>>
>
>I hope he meant the latter, because I thought that's what he meant and
>therefore I checked the patch in about three hours ago.
>  
>
That's what I thought Jason meant as well.  If it's not, he'll let you 
know, and we'll back it out...

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com