Wed Nov 17 17:14:00 GMT 2004
The changed behavior between 3.3 and 3.4+ is intentional. The XPASSES on
the old branches are annoying.
>Therefore, the current behavior is definitely not accidental.
Yep. This was compromise behavior. I think there was previous commentary
on this on the mailing list.
>That said, I agree that the present situation is not optimal, but I'm also
>sure that we do *not* want hundreds of XPASSes!
>In my opinion, very-very roughly, testcases involving not available named
>locales should not be run at all. This would require a preliminary check
>before running the testsuite. But, if we decide to go this way, we should
>make sure is obvious from the results *why* some tests are not run...
Well what we do now is check at configure time if certain functionality
(to be specific) is going to be used, then prune the testlist
accordingly. Perhaps this is the better solution.
More information about the Libstdc++