weak for Darwin

[Geoffrey Keating]

On 01/11/2004, at 10:56 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>
>> There is, however, a complication.  The Darwin loader doesn't really
>> handle weak symbols, or symbol overriding of any kind, unless you use
>> flat namespaces.  After the afore-mentioned discussion, we concluded
>> that the best thing would be if the Darwin loader did handle this, and
>> it's planned to be implemented (you'll note that the magic words
>> "implemented now" did not appear in that sentence).
>
> Why hack up the FSF sources for this? Couldn't you just keep this on
> your vendor branch?

Could you be more specific about which change I made that you refer to 
by "this"?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2408 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20041101/7dda6e5d/attachment.p7s>