[Patch] Convert pool_allocator

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Mon Mar 22 00:26:00 GMT 2004


>Basically, enabling it at configure time leads to a behavior which is
>(supposed to be) identical to that of 3.3 default allocator.

Dude, this looks great.

>Of course, we can consider tweaking it further for MT/not, but I think
>its real virtue is stability in providing a baseline form of "pooling"
>against which more sophisticated ideas will be compared.

Absolutely.

Is there any chance that, as part of this patch, you can add in
__pool_alloc tests in the performance/20_util/allocator* files? That way
we can have a performance baseline as well.

-benjamin



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list