11706 vs ([lno] Canonical iv creation)
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Fri Mar 12 20:12:00 GMT 2004
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:
| Hi again,
|
| finally, I have been able to actually test the the new pass on the code
| we care about. The current assembler, is simply *astonishing*.
Yep.
Fixing the problem at the _right place_ helps emitting good
executable in much broader situations, instead of damaging random
places in the library.
I bet there are other places where this improvement will be far
noticeable. I conjecture that very soon, we will not be afraid of
using right abstractions through the library instead of trying to
hide defects in the compiler.
-- Gaby
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list