11706 vs ([lno] Canonical iv creation)

Gabriel Dos Reis gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Fri Mar 12 20:12:00 GMT 2004


Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Hi again,
| 
| finally, I have been able to actually test the the new pass on the code
| we care about. The current assembler, is simply *astonishing*.

Yep.

Fixing the problem at the _right place_ helps emitting good
executable in much broader situations, instead of damaging random
places in the library. 
I bet there are other places where this improvement will be far
noticeable.  I conjecture that very soon, we will not be afraid of  
using right abstractions through the library instead of trying to
hide defects in the compiler.

-- Gaby



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list