[Patch] libstdc++/16210

[Phil Edwards]

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:20:54AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> 
> the problem and its solution seem simple: submitter notices that support
> for long long types in the iostreams is enabled only if strto(u)ll are
> available. However, those functions are *not* used anymore in 3.4 and we
> should simply take into account what is requested at configure time (not
> changing the default, of course). The below does this.

Works for me.

Since we no longer need the strto[u]ll functions, I'm wondering if there's
any reason at all to allow 'long long' to be disabled.  Any benefit gained
by doing so?


Phil