patch: mt_allocator.h

Dhruv Matani dhruvbird@gmx.net
Fri Jun 11 08:50:00 GMT 2004


On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 11:06, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> However, I agree, the single pool is probably desired. The downside is
> that this will impact the ability to actually tune the memory allocation
> parameters, since you'd have to do this before first allocation.

Actually, this did cross my mind sometime ago, so, is there any way to
have the mt_alloc<char/wchar_t> be separate from
mt_alloc<any_other_type>?


-- 
        -Dhruv Matani.
http://www.geocities.com/dhruvbird/

Proud to be a Vegetarian.
http://www.vegetarianstarterkit.com/
http://www.vegkids.com/vegkids/index.html




More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list