[RFC] __N mark-up... or not?

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>while working on basic_string I noticed that we aren't
>>consistently using everywhere (in basic_string and
>>elsewhere) the __N mark-up in the throw messages.
>>
>>Should we?
>>
>I would think so, yes.
>
OK.

>BTW some of your recent string patches are not wrapped for 80 column. I'm sure
>this is a simple oversight on your part.
>
Well, that 80 column issue is weird... I don't think we have been much 
strict
about that in the past.. Shall we? In that case, I have to take appropriate
actions (my editor doesn't tell me automatically the column number)

Anyway, if we really want to enforce the 80 column requirement, I think 
there
is a lot of work to do: in the last days I never added code wider than what
was already present in the surrounding lines, I think ;)

Paolo.