Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?

[Andreas Kohn]

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:09, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Andreas Kohn wrote:
> 
> >So, if I read this correctly, "Note that implementers can make this
> >change in a binary compatible way by providing both overloads; this
> >would be a conforming extension." overloads could be added to libstdc++
> >without violating the standard?
> >
> >Is anything like that planned?
> >  
> >
> Ok, I'm going to apply the below to mainline (would be 3.5.0 or 4.0), not to
> the release branch, however, since we want complete backward and forward
> compatibility.
> 
That's great, thank you very much.

--
Andreas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20040813/495a04f3/attachment.sig>