[PATCH] PR libstdc++/13045 / C++ demangler, floating values and function pointer type return type postfix fix.

Geert Bosch bosch@gnat.com
Tue Nov 25 01:08:00 GMT 2003


On Nov 24, 2003, at 16:30, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> It's perhaps worth noting that the libiberty demangler currently
> follows a much simpler approach than the C++ demangler, which is to
> not attempt to interpret floating constants at all.  This is fully
> compliant with non-IEEE targets, and produces demanglings like
>     void f<1>(A<(1) + (((int)(-((float)3f800000))))>)

Doesn't (float) 0x3f800000 produce the floating point number 
1065353216.0
(which has memory representation 0x4e7e0000) instead of 1.0 as you 
expect?

   -Geert



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list