Two or three initial observations on the fp prining patch
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Sun Nov 23 00:59:00 GMT 2003
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes:
| We already have |__SHRT_MAX__, ||__INT_MAX__ and so on for the integer
| types,|
| |therefore, basically, we lack: floating point endianness and
| floating-point|
| |format. I would try to extract and update those bits from your original|
| |patch, this seems feasible.
|
| However, basing on your explanation above, I wonder if something more
| general, including integer endianness and so on, would be better...
Well, I think the __XXX_{MAX, MIN}__ thingy is a solved problem.
What currently concerns me is datatype byte ordering. It is my
understanding that a patch to address that issue should not just limit
itself to floating point datatype. It ought to consider all
fundamental datatypes.
I certainly can submit something, but that won't happen before next
Thursday; the reason is my moving to a new country/continent
(completely new to me) and time to get basics (apartments, ...) set.
But, in the meantime, I'll try to finish the the design and send you
something for comments.
-- Gaby
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list