Use of malloc() in v3
Stephen M. Webb
stephen.webb@bregmasoft.com
Tue Nov 11 16:43:00 GMT 2003
I've been stumbling across several places in libstdc++ where malloc() is used
instead of ::operator new(). Since I'm working on a platform that doesn't
supply malloc(), this inconveniences me.
Is there any reason for choosing malloc() over of ::operator new()? I can
think of reasons to use ::operator new() over malloc() (namely, a single
point of replacement for instrumentation or performance tweaking, and of
course the unusual case of not having a malloc implementation).
I do have some patches locally that would change this.
--
Stephen M. Webb
stephen.webb@bregmasoft.com
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list