On extension headers and ease of use

Phil Edwards phil@jaj.com
Fri May 9 18:59:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:39:54AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> And in fact, that some implementations made the mistake to put their
> extensions in std:: is now causing serious grief.  Not only hash_map
> won't be standardized with the exact interface, but the name hash_map
> won't be standardized at all.

Yes.  We're in this situation because of ill-informed decisions to add stuff
to std::.  There aren't many options (for free software) other than taking
it back out (and enabling some wrappers, some backwards compatability,
some helper functions, whatever).

Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list