Question re PR libstdc++/5001

Loren James Rittle rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com
Mon Jun 23 23:22:00 GMT 2003


In article <mailman.6820.1056405209.3041.gnu-libstdcpp@lists.nsr.labs.mot.com>
(blasted new mailing list software!) you write:

> Scanning through PR's, this one last had a comment in 2001 from Loren,
> stating that this isn't a bug, but a feature.

> Can we close this or is there still some action to take here?

Jerry, I closed it with a statement of about when it (the QoI) was
fixed.  I think recent QoI/performance patches from Paolo et al. have
only improved things in that area.

Regards,
Loren



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list