[Patch] Make stringbuf::_M_sync non virtual

[Nathan Myers]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:17:10PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> 
> I can't find a sound reason to have _M_sync virtual, thus making,
> in principle, the inlining more difficult: in fact its cousin
> filebuf::_M_set_buffer isn't.
> 
> Tested x86-linux, ok?

I agree.  "virtual" meaningful only as a documented interface or as an
implementation hack.  

Nathan Myers
ncm-nospam@cantrip.org