[Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)

Paolo Carlini pcarlini@unitus.it
Wed Jun 18 18:42:00 GMT 2003


Paolo Carlini wrote:

> Yep... and stringbuf/setbuf also misses that '> 0'. Will do later today. 

Actually (do you agree?) stringbuf/setbuf misses '>= 0'.

Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list