[Patch] Clean up sbumpc, move back _M_buf_size, do not special case unbuffered _M_underflow...
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@unitus.it
Tue Jun 10 00:19:00 GMT 2003
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>No, this sounds like a great plan. I just didn't want you to lose test
>cases.
>
Ok, I have just committed the patch as posted.
In the next days we can consider tweaking it here and there: e.g.,
probably Nathan is right that setbuf should have on top 'else if (__s &&
__n >= 1)'; also _M_destroy_pback probably now can be simplified,
removing the 'if (_M_pback_cur_save)', since can't happen anymore that
the get area pointers are null.
Many thanks to everyone for the attention,
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list