[RFC/Patch] What about using seekoff(-1, ...) for unbuffered underflow?
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@unitus.it
Sat Jun 7 20:07:00 GMT 2003
Nathan Myers wrote:
>This strikes me as the best approach. Essentially, with streambufs
>there's no such thing, really, as unbuffered, because sgetc implies
>a one-character buffer. So, when it's supposed to be unbuffered,
>instead use a one-character buffer. (This relates to users calling
>setbuf with a one-character buffer being, properly, equivalent to
>running unbuffered; the only difference is in who owns the buffer.)
>
>
Thanks. I'm working on this and definitely at the irrelevant cost of one
additional
char everything seems much cleaner.
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list